Pros
The name can look good on your CV
Cons
My time at J.P. Morgan was deeply disappointing. Despite the prestige often associated with the company, the reality on the ground was quite different. Promotions were rare, and not based on merit. High-performing individuals were consistently overlooked, while favoritism played a clear and troubling role in recognition and rewards. It was not uncommon to see employees with the same performance ratings receiving vastly different bonuses, depending on their relationship with management. The work environment was demoralizing. Long hours were the norm, with little to no appreciation shown for the effort put in. Salaries were notably below market rates, making it hard to justify the demands placed on employees. One of the most frustrating aspects was the disconnect between management and day-to-day operations. Key decisions were made by individuals who lacked a clear understanding of BAU (business as usual) activities, leading to inefficiencies and avoidable disruptions. The office location is inconvenient and lacks even basic amenities, yet there is a strict five-day in-office policy. This lack of flexibility, paired with the poor conditions, contributes heavily to employee dissatisfaction. Turnover was alarmingly high — in my team alone, 10 people left within a span of three months. This level of attrition speaks volumes about the culture and overall morale. In short, my experience at J.P. Morgan was one of disillusionment. If you're considering a role here, especially in this particular location or team, proceed with caution. It is not an environment conducive to growth, recognition, or well-being.