Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Xerox as 100% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Auxiliar Cocina and rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Auxiliar Cocina and roles were rated as the easiest.
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
I applied online. I interviewed at Xerox in Jan 2011
Interview
Very easy going, interviewed for 2 hours with 2 leads and a manager. Very nice and honest. Questions were pretty basic. Focuses on cost cutting and productivity. Once the interview was over they were back with an offer within 2 days. Getting the interview set up took almost 2 weeks, have patience.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Talk about a difficult situation you had with a co-worker and how did you resolve it?
I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Xerox (Lexington-Fayette, KY) in Jun 2014
Interview
Hiring and Interview process was very professional exactly what you would expect for the most part - Too bad the training after the hiring process was laughable. I can't believe how little was put into the training and the lack of training obviously received by the trainers.
I applied online. The process took 2 days. I interviewed at Xerox in Aug 2014
Interview
There was a somewhat lengthy online application process, the kind that asks you a bunch of vague multiple-choice questions regarding your personality and only allows you to select from two provided answers, oftentimes not having an answer that would actually be relevant. The PCs provided to applicants in the training room are crusty old Dells running what might have been Windows 95 with monitors turned far brighter than necessary and peripherals from the early 90s. Also, the entire application and assessment process is conducted through a very outdated release of Internet Explorer. To say the least, I felt pretty uncomfortable inputing personal data over what is likely a poorly secured network. They could have easily reformatted those drives to run a sparse Linux distro with Firefox or Chromium, and replaced the clunky old mice and keyboards with some fresh small-budget peripherals (think AmazonBasics), but it seems like everything was donated to them by a pre-Millenium elementary school classroom and they couldn't be bothered to optimize anything. First impressions suggest that this tech company is anything but tech-savvy, or perhaps they just care so little about their bottom rung employees that they can't be bothered to offer them up-to-date tools to use in their workplace. Either way, it's bad news.
The people working in the office were pleasant enough, but it was clear very early on that I wouldn't fit in. As soon as the interviewer got a whiff of an independent nature and an unwillingness to be a brain-dead robot, the interview was as good as finished.
Also, the walls are covered with "Xerox" branded inspirational posters. If you have to constantly remind your employees that their job is great in order to keep morale up, it's probably not very good at all. Employees should want to work for your company without you needing to cover their workspace in mind-numbing ["Xerox is so awesome!"] propaganda.