AECOM Senior Structural Engineer/Project Engineer reviews

3.7

59% would recommend to a friend

(170 total reviews)
avatar

Troy Rudd

80% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Senior Structural Engineer/Project Engineer employees have rated AECOM with 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 170 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Senior Structural Engineer/Project Engineer professionals have a good working experience there. AECOM is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Senior Structural Engineer/Project Engineer professionals compared to other employers within the Servicios de construcción, reparación y mantenimiento industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

170 reviews
3.0
Mar 16, 2016

Engineer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefit. Opportunity to work in a really big project. Good colleagues.

Cons

Too much profit oriented environment. Things get really stressed out when economy is tough. Good experience people are leaving. No vision to retain good employee.

4.0
Mar 15, 2016

Moving in the right direction...

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) COLLABORATION - absolutely the best selling point for this company - it's highly encouraged - use Chatter and Technical Practice Network to share information and find people 2) TECHNICAL BENEFITS - all free (for employees): ASCE Webinars, Red Vector courses, CAD training, Trimble, Bentley and Autodesk partnerships, ASCE Membership, AECOM University... the list goes on and on... you don't have to worry about having tools and training you need to succeed! 3) INSPIRATIONAL LEADERSHIP - Mike Burke is a great communicator, and it's exciting to see the direction the company takes in the next couple years... 4) GLOBAL REACH - Learn from, connect with and work with colleagues all over the world! 5) FLEXIBILITY IN WORK SCHEDULE - Although I personally have not tested this feature out yet, many have shared flexible schedules that I envy - seems to be a great company to work for if you can't do a traditional 8-5 in the office.

Cons

1) HEALTH BENEFITS - Comprehensive, yes, but more expensive than one would expect for a company with so many employees 2) TRADITIONAL OFFICE ENVIRONMENT - I'm speaking about my office on this one - I'm sure each location is different - our office is legacy URS - very stuffy old school environment with a generally disengaged staff. Hopefully, 'fresh air' of new AECOM movements will soon waft into our corner of the globe! 3) NEW LEADERSHIP FROM OUTSIDE - Every week we get emails about a new vice president/C-suite exec, rarely are they former AECOM employees! They're coming in high from other companies, which sends a message I don't think is favorable: you won't get promoted high from within the company 4) SOME SUPPORT SERVICES WERE NOT MERGED WELL - Take, for example, indirect procurement, which was in a serious state of flux, dissent and pure confusion/dread (many lost their jobs or left before they were cut) for over a year! Admin personnel have also complained about lack of easy access to basic information to do their job since the merge. For support services that are so necessary, this says not all departments in the company are as well managed and cared for as engineering/architecture/sciences. Word of caution for support personnel.

1.0
Nov 24, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Multidisciplinary environment, big projects, a few talented people, globally recognised brand, young work force, good male/female balance, bright office.

Cons

Salary discrimination based on nationality. Highly stressful work environment with long hours. In 2014, 3 panic attacks and 1 heart attack have happened within the office, commonly occurring before approaching deadlines. Very poor decision making at the management and executive level. Extremely slow advancement of career ( 4 years per promotion ). Growth of salary that is below the nominal rate of inflation ( 1 - 3% per year if any ). Poor quality of engineering work and especially poor architectural work. Lack of ethics and accountability by submitting poor and un-qualifying designs for construction. Low quality interview process ( expect to find people at the senior level who haven't had a justifiable work experience ). Long work hours, tight deadlines, unorganised design progression, and absolutely no employee compensation to balance it out. Unexciting work environment, sort of like a library. Mentality of "Us versus Them" between management and employees. Parking nightmare around the building. Lack of culture and diversity, expect to see tribes sticking to each other as would be in a prison atmosphere. 30 minute lunch allocated for a 9 hour work shift, combined with prison-style food for catering. Little or no investment in employee's career development.

Viewing 157 - 159 of 170 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,638 AECOM reviews submitted anonymously by AECOM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AECOM is right for you.