AECOM reviews

3.7

69% would recommend to a friend

(11,153 total reviews)
avatar

Troy Rudd

79% approve of CEO

61% positive business outlook

AECOM has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 11,153 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AECOM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Servicios de construcción, reparación y mantenimiento industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

11K reviews
3.0
Apr 13, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work in general - I was given plenty of freedom. The benefits are very good. The opportunities are there - all over the planet. Young people should not be discouraged - you will be in demand and appreciated.

Cons

So large you are destined to be a small fish in an enormous ocean. Organization is ridiculously top heavy - vice presidents everywhere. Because of cutbacks that are currently quite a lot of people who are overextended and quite frankly there is no way that all the work can possibly be accomplished with such a lean staff. But hey, if you are politically saavy you can succeed in AECOM. Just watch out - once you hit a certain age - and salary level - your job will become expendable especially if you are overhead. Your best bet is to find a job chargeable position if you are not a politician. I worked at AECOM for 16 years and I watched year after year as older employees were let go time after time. Surprise! my number came up as well. One serious word of caution: don't think you will succeed here by merely good performance. I was given a glowing review and a raise only two months prior to being let go.

1.0
Mar 25, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Mega projects to work on -Flexible working hours -Good benefits

Cons

Company has been transitioning from 5 different companies to one unify one. During this transition upper management has forgotten to look into what middle management is doing and therefore a bunch of inexperience people has made it into the middle management. People with not people skills or management skills. People that think that the old good boy network is going to take care of them. In reality that is cancer that eats the company from within and limits the abilities of the people that are up and coming. My current office does not have a great local presence because of this people. They are wanted by the local community so therefore we do not get work from our local DOT, City or Counties. We depend on other offices to have work. Inexperience project managers, department managers and office managers do not know how to manage projects and do not share information. Out 5 projects in my department 3 are out of budget. Project managers do not follow ethics when it come to the time charges and scope creeping. Department managers are too young to determine what needs to be done and who needs to work on what. Our office manager just got promoted from department manager but he is incapable of bringing work to the office because he is not liked by the clients because he is too young and does not represent our company well.

1.0
Sep 29, 2010

Resistance Is Futile, You Will Be Assimilated!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Hundreds of offices spread across dozens of countries. Many businesses. Several of the business lines are composed of people from primarily a single acquisition who still keep in contact, allowing for some effective networking to counteract the official corporate miscommunications.

Cons

Firm built by continuously buying a variety of firms and then amalgamating them inneffectively by the “throw the spaghetti against the wall technique.” The results of this are as follows: 1. “Lots of chiefs, fewer Indians”. Many, many layers of upper management, lie between staff and the CEO. Consequently, communication is lousy. 2. Despite all the upper management, few of the regular processes to run the business are in place and most of them are very poorly implemented. For example, no process is in place to upgrade software, to administratively allow different parts of the company to work on the same project, to allow folks in different business lines who do similar things to find out about each other, etc. It’s pathetic. 3. Decision-making is all centralized at the very upper levels. Middle managers have no control to make decisions on issues that affect their direct reports, their office, and their clients. Those decisions will be made by upper level managers hundreds of miles away who don’t know your business and won’t make an effort to find out. A classic example of this is our new office. AECOM moved us to a new office this year that is tiny, cramped, and noisy. Our office is filled with planners, not engineers. We need space to layout out figures and do hand drawn renditions, to meet collectively with other colleagues to collaborate on designs, and semi-private spaces so we can talk with clients on the phone or chat with them when they visit. Instead we have a small “library-like” office where you can’t even start a conversation as the noise immediately distracts everyone, there’s no layout space to work on drawings or meet clients, and everyone gets the joy of getting to listen to everyone else’s phone conversation. 4. Messages from corporate are incredibly insensitive – some say Dilbertesque. First there will be message announcing an upper level manager promotion for bringing in lots of business and doing great work, followed by a message from the CEO saying the company is doing great, followed by a message stating that several more staff were laid off today as the company is not doing well. 5. Staff are highly disengaged. They are expected to be highly billable, but are handed projects that have been grossly underbudgeted. Many find the only solution to keep their official billable hours up is to stay late nights and come in on weekends and work “off the clock” to get the project done within budget (ie don't log the many hours really spent). Additionally, they have no say in what happens, continual layoffs and voluntary departures have created a high rate of turnover and continual project chaos, and there is a stifling bureaucracy that forces one to do endless paperwork for even the simplest task.

Viewing 244 - 246 of 11,153 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,616 AECOM reviews submitted anonymously by AECOM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AECOM is right for you.