Control Risks reviews

Conflicts among management sometimes led to a difficult work environment. Communication between offices was sometimes poor, which would sometimes lead to inconsistent work product. Still, the experience was positive.

- It's still a security company first and foremost: the other parts of the company do have to play second-fiddle, receive less management attention accordingly, and the business will always chase the fat physical security contracts first, often to the detriment of the other business lines, its own reputation, and frequently confusing large revenues with small margins - This is also reflected in a management structure in which "old(er) white men" are still massively over-represented, and a services background and time spent in "dangerous places" are both more highly prized than business acumen - This in turn leads to a steady exodus of talented mid-level staff, who simply cannot see long-term opportunities when the same old/entrenched faces are likely to continue to fill the upper roles forever - regardless of how well they actually perform - The company's strong market position, and the neverending shortage of geopolitical crises and criminal actions boosting its sales - as well as the absence of anyone from outside the privately-owned company really asking the management team any difficult questions - make it a little lazy and complacent. The sales and marketing functions are both way weaker than they should be as a result, reflecting a belief that "the clients will come to us; we don't have to go to them", enabling inferior competitors to take away more business than they really should - Standards of output can vary by location and function; the company's heavily regional model does lead to different parts of the business competing with each other rather than collaborating, and doing things for clients that would probably be best done by others elsewhere