employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Amazon Web Services

Part of Amazon

Is this your company?

Good place to learn, but they do not value employees - Senior Product Manager - Technical Amazon Web Services Employee Review

3.0
Feb 5, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good opportunities to advance your technical and product skills - Solid compensation, although the growth is largely driven by stock gains. - PMTs are given a lot of ownership and autonomy. Good relationships across product and engineering allow you to get technical work done smoothly - Customer obsessed culture gives you the right to support your arguments with data and customer feedback, even if slightly outside your wheelhouse

Cons

- Management does not value their employees. Senior leadership will throw tantrums about timelines without trying to understand root causes, and ask people to work weekends and holidays to meet their expectations. This is acceptable as it "raises the bar" for teams in Amazon culture speak. Many decisions taken top down due to "disagree and commit" leadership principle and escalation culture. This also leads to constant stress across team. - Career growth is difficult since recent flattening actions. Many L7 PMT managers got pushed down to IC roles, creating a large band of L7 ICs and slowing promotions for all. Performance is not rewarded adequately, and you are constantly considered to do other peoples job to "take on scope". Raises have basically been stalled since 2023. - The promotion prospect is frequently dangled in front of you but the process is 1-2 years long once your manager commits. Managers have to write documents to justify your promotion, it is not always in your hands. Frequent "re-orgs" which change your direct management hinder your career growth as your new manager is often not as motivated to write your role leveling or scoping document (two docs your manager must write and take up to leadership for approval of your promo).

Explore other reviews about Amazon Web Services

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company with challenging assignments

Cons

Lot is expected of you

4.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Operated in systems that had real scale, operational constraints, and production consequences.

Cons

Working at Amazon Web Services gave me strong exposure to distributed systems, operational ownership, and production-scale infrastructure, but there were definitely tradeoffs as well. One downside was that, like many large organizations, ownership could become fragmented. You often own a subsystem or workflow rather than an entire product end-to-end, which can limit exposure to broader architectural decision-making unless you deliberately seek it out. There was also significant process overhead. Design reviews, operational processes, dependency coordination, and organizational alignment were valuable for learning rigor, but they can slow iteration compared to smaller engineering teams. Another challenge is that large internal ecosystems can abstract away infrastructure complexity. AWS has extensive internal tooling, deployment systems, and operational platforms, which are powerful, but some of that experience does not transfer directly outside the company. I also found that operational work could dominate engineering time at points. Handling production issues, retries, integration failures, and on-call responsibilities teaches reliability engineering well, but it can reduce the amount of time spent on deeper technical exploration or greenfield development. Finally, there is the perception aspect. AWS is a strong name, but experienced interviewers know there is wide variance between teams and roles. The company name opens doors, but ultimately you still need to demonstrate technical depth, ownership, and strong engineering judgment independently of the brand.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All