Pros
Overall, I believe the firm is making a genuine effort to improve and create more opportunities for its team members. The recent acquisition has significantly expanded the firm’s footprint, opening the door to broader career paths and professional growth. I think Moss Adams is a solid firm and will bring a more focused trajectory to Baker Tilly. I think the firm has a lot of talent, but it needs to be channeled and people should be encouraged to explore career paths that are exciting for them.
Cons
As the firm continues to scale rapidly, exciting opportunities are emerging for professionals at all levels. However, the pace of growth has occasionally outpaced internal communication and transparency. While the firm promotes a culture of openness, the acquisition process felt dark to many, creating uncertainty around roles, responsibilities, and strategic direction. For example, during a firm leadership call, the CEO said people should “stay in their lane” during this transitional period, which made people feel frustrated and dismissed. I was part of a group that had worked together for a long time and had become deeply rooted in legacy approaches, showing resistance to change and hesitancy in embracing new perspectives. When new team members introduced fresh ideas, they were often dismissed if those ideas didn’t align with the existing leadership’s preferences. This resistance was well-known, yet it was disappointing to see that senior leadership did not take meaningful steps to address it, especially when one individual consistently contributed to the problems. While long-tenured employees bring valuable institutional knowledge and help preserve culture, they need to be open to innovation a different thinking/strategy, particularly when senior hires (naturally) bring different experiences and methodologies from other firms. The mindset of “we’ve always done it this way” is incompatible with the firm’s growth trajectory and won’t set the firm up for success. In some cases, team leaders were excluded from meetings or events, decisions became personal, and disrespect toward certain leaders was openly expressed in front of junior staff. These behaviors undermined the leadership's credibility and eroded morale. Junior team members were placed in uncomfortable situations, expected to navigate interpersonal conflicts they had no control over, while still needing to work with all of the leaders involved. Instead of creating growth and development, personal agendas began to shape the team environment, creating a toxic atmosphere. As previously mentioned, stronger, more decisive action should have been taken to address these issues and reinforce a culture of respect, transparency, and progress, values the firm regularly promotes as part of its identity (or its "differentiator").