A good company to work for - Senior Consultant CGI Employee Review

4.0
Jun 14, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of opportunities (if you seek them out) Competitive salary (once benefits factored in) Good management communication Strong management team at corporate and senior local level Heavily promotes & supports employee training Initiatives to support a good work-life balance Little office politics (at least in the area I work in) General sense that senior management actually do care about employees (even though there is a bit of a sense of disconnection but that's largely due to the size and global nature of the company)

Cons

Corporate procurement system is a joke (I think it's designed you give up and just pay for stuff yourself...) Corporate appraisal system is abysmal - it's all about you proving you've met objectives by getting feedback, the person doing the appraisal has no idea what you actually do day to day Financial micro-management has gone too far (it was needed to get control of expense spending etc. but is now just more and more intrusive and time consuming). You have to get pre-approval for *any* travel expense...

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great environment of people

Cons

No major cons while employed

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All