Slavery-like job (Contractors = slaves; government workers = masters) - Support Associate CGI Employee Review

1.0
Feb 14, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- work is easy, don't have to use your brain for anything - convenient location in Old City Philadelphia - great pay for someone just leaving high school or college - Great way to think about landing a job in being a Federal Government employee

Cons

- Accrue 1.54 per week (3.08 per paycheck), use this for both Sick and Vacation. If you do not have PTO you have to use Leave Without Pay (LWOP) and you can only use 40 hours of LWOP before they fire you. (Seen this multiple times) - Managers and Supervisors treat CGI workers like garbage like this is still slavery days but yet bow down to government workers. - Little to no room of growth - Revolving door of employees - Some of the people who work for CGI are uncoof, unprofessional, ghetto, and say anything out their mouth. - I would runaway or keep on searching if someone needs a job.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All