Empty promises - Junior Software Developer CGI Employee Review

2.0
Sep 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Good starting pay -Good benefits -Take in a range of graduates of different experiences

Cons

CGI promised a great place to kickstart a career in development, but from the beginning those promises quickly faded. As graduates, we were shuffled onto teams with little onboarding process, left to force ourselves into the teams we were assigned with no regard to our existing skills. Schemes put in place for us felt at odds with what we needed at the time and highlighted the disconnect between us as new developers and management. These felt more for the benefit of the upper management and contributed to an environment where we felt used. Whenever this was brought up with management we were shrugged off as teething issues, or some project difficulties that would soon pass. This has been a constant throughout my time at this company over multiple different projects. With the pandemic, junior developers have become stuck on projects we were shuffled to with little opportunities for lateral movement onto other areas. Some booted off existing ones for senior developers to take their place. Each concern placed has been met with apologetics and dismissals. Add to this the slow-pay progression and performance reviews being bulky at best it often feels hopeless. This has led to myself, and many of the others I joined with feeling forced into a corner, their careers stagnating with little opportunity for self-development.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All