Mediocre employer, you could do better - Systems Administrator CGI Employee Review

2.0
May 18, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Morale of employees seemed good. Many friendly people that welcome new hires. Some areas allow work from home a couple days per week.

Cons

Lack of structure. I have worked in other similarly sized companies and they were all setup and managed a lot better. Unrealistic/unfavorable expectations of employees. Management does not know the processes to get things done. Director was being too hands on when should be doing more management tasks. Conflict with management was handled very poorly. Did not listen to employees, just dictated to them. Compared to other large companies their processes are horrible. It is a hodgepodge of programs slapped together that do not work. Stuck about 10 years behind other companies. Change management for one. Also with recent re-org people have titles of senior IT admins but they do not have the skillset of a senior IT admin.

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
May 27, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work environment Strong leadership

Cons

Room for growth can be limited unless you really seek it out.

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All