I-CAP - Senior Test Automation Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

conducting various induction and engagement calls

Cons

Recruiter should be responsive and should respond promptly to the candidate before joining and also post joining as they are the first point of contact to the new joiner which really tells company culture and values

avatar
Capgemini Response
2mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. It is encouraging to know that the induction and engagement calls were helpful in providing clarity and support during the onboarding phase. Creating a structured and engaging start for new colleagues remains an important focus. Your concern regarding recruiter responsiveness is acknowledged and appreciated. Recruiters play a critical role as the first point of contact for candidates both before joining and post onboarding, and timely communication is essential to delivering a positive experience that reflects Capgemini’s culture and values. This feedback is valuable, and efforts will be made to work with the concerned teams to strengthen responsiveness and ensure more consistent and prompt communication. Thank you once again for sharing your experience. Feedback such as this helps identify improvement areas and reinforces our commitment to enhancing the onboarding journey at Capgemini.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All