I-CAP - Performance Test Engineer Capgemini Employee Review

5.0
Apr 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everything is ok .Overall a good expereince.

Cons

Just mention general ODC names to maintain office attendence

avatar
Capgemini Response
2mo
Thank you for sharing 5 star feedback. We are delighted to hear that your overall experience at Capgemini has been good and that everything has been going well for you. Creating a supportive workplace with a positive employee experience remains an important focus for us, and it is encouraging to know that your journey so far has been smooth and satisfactory. We also acknowledge your suggestion regarding office attendance and the need to mention general ODC names for better clarity and tracking. We understand that clear communication around reporting locations, ODC details, and attendance-related expectations helps employees plan effectively and maintain consistency. Your input is valuable as we continue to strengthen our communication and processes to make office attendance requirements more transparent and easier to follow. Thank you once again for sharing your thoughts and for being a valued part of Capgemini. Wishing you continued growth, success, and an even better.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All