People don't matter, only results count. And the results are fake. - Supervising Associate Capgemini Employee Review

1.0
Sep 14, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. I'd say the fact that the office in NY is close to Saks Fifth Avenue, but I never got out early enough to go shopping and my lunch hour was non-existent.

Cons

Unethical management Zero work-life balance Unrealistic expectations Poor communication - difficult to obtain information, especially personal inquiries Hostile work environment Unorganized Given the company’s motto of “People Matter, Results Count” I expected to have an opportunity to be developed and coached by my manager and be rewarded for good performance. Unfortunately my experience was anything but rewarding. Management is rude and unethical, creates forecasting models that aren’t based on reality and expects you to go along with it and “not ask questions.” In addition, while I am not a person that requires hand holding, I expected to be given clear direction and objectives but I never was. There were many times I was thrown into the deep end of the pool and was told “You figure it out.” The performance review process is a joke that is extremely subjective and not representative of your tasks, goals and objectives.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Cons

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All