Lack of vision and attempting to run a big company like a small one will lead to demise - Anonymous employee Ellucian Employee Review

1.0
Jul 12, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were some really talented, passionate people who worked for SunGard Higher Education. Fair compensation. Flexibility to work remotely. Excellent middle managers who cared about employees professionally and personally.

Cons

The strategic merger has been mismanaged from the beginning. The transition would have been better managed had a new CEO been seated from the beginning. This would have resolved the personal investiture that some had for particular product solutions and people and allowed a new leader to look at the business holistically and make the best business decisions. The choices related to product direction and strategy was terribly disappointing. Little room for career paths--each person has his role and is not encouraged to add to a greater conversation. Those who question decisions are viewed as not being team players when in truth the questions were legitimate and had they been listened to, it would have fostered a climate that encouraged feedback, collaboration and shared interest in the company's success. Employees were marginalized, not valued for experience and talent after the merger. Employee satisfaction was terrible. The organization is terribly hierarchical. While feedback is allegedly encouraged, there was very little evidence of this as crucial business decisions were made. Long term employees and those in the field were not consulted nor were opinions respected or appreciated.

Explore other reviews about Ellucian

5.0
May 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work-life balance is amazing, great team to work with. Lots of opportunities to advance and learn new things

Cons

None. I've had an amazing experience working for Ellucian!

1
1.0
Apr 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ellucian had some genuinely brilliant people. I mean real talent. Smart engineers, sharp support people who could look at a broken system and somehow see both the problem and the political disaster hiding behind it. A lot of people there cared deeply about higher ed. They understood that colleges and universities are not just “customers.” They are institutions trying to keep students moving, faculty supported, and operations alive with systems that often looked held together by duct tape, PLSQL scripts, and institutional trauma.

Cons

Then there was the C-suite. Every company has executives. That’s normal. But this group often felt less like corporate stewards and more like LinkedIn influencers who accidentally wandered into an ERP company. They seemed distant. Aloof. Not deeply engaged with the actual work, the clients, or the people carrying the weight. There was a lot of executive polish, a lot of corporate language, a lot of “vision,” but not always the kind of grounded leadership that makes employees say, “I trust these people with the future of the company.” At times, it felt like the people closest to the customers understood the business better than the people paid the most to lead it.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All