restructure pains - Anonymous employee HP Inc. Employee Review
3.0
Jun 14, 2016
Anonymous employee
Former employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
collaborative, international , many opportunities to learn
Cons
morale is bad when layoffs are slowly done in multiple waves, performance evaluations are solely up to one person, and work isn't recognized unless you have a big title, benefits is very cheap compared to other tech companies.
HP Inc. Response
9y
Hi there! Thank you for your review and for taking the time to recognize our working environment and learning opportunities! To your point about restructuring, I'd like to mention that we have already announced a proposed restructuring, and the same thing is happening in many other tech companies. In addition to this, all employees impacted by our restructuring efforts are welcome to re-apply for employment. Also, the entire performance management process is being improved, and more details will be shared with employees soon. ~ Madalina Antohe, Employer brand & digital media leader
Explore other reviews about HP Inc.
5.0
Oct 20, 2025
Anonymous employee
Current employee, more than 1 year
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
Diverse workforce, operating in over 150 countries, providing vast opportunities for career mobility and specialty niche changes, if desired. Very low employee turn-over with a high number of personnel staying decades and ultimately retiring from the company. Committed to high ethical standards, strong privacy policies/procedures, and extremely fair employment practices. It just feels good to know they actually mean it when they claim it.
Cons
Like most (very) large organizations, they have many operational silos and could benefit from taking (and implementing) feedback from employee surveys aimed at sharing operational efficiency and modernization.
1
2.0
May 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Current employee, more than 10 years
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook
Pros
Good working culture. It falls a little prey to acting like we're a family and not a business, but at least it doesn't pretend "we work hard, we play hard".
Cons
ELT and upper management have zero vision for the company besides desperately trying to pull up stock prices. Company continues to make deep long-term sacrifices for short term gains, that barely rise above the performance of our competitors.
Benefits weaken each year. Example: CVS Caremark now handles RxD insurance, and CVS Caremark is incompetent and exploitative.