Goldman Sachs reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(19,405 total reviews)
avatar

David M. Solomon

63% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Goldman Sachs has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 19,405 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Goldman Sachs employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

19K reviews
1.0
Jul 22, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good benefits - wellness center - cafeteria. Smart people, name is good for résumé.

Cons

Horrible environment/culture, cliquish, snobby, condescending, cut-throat, unhappy and over-worked employees. Unless you have a connection to someone in upper mgmt don't expect to be treated w dignity. Smart but stupid - inflated egos that won't allow for self reflection on their improvement. Employes are not their best assets as proclaimed. Spare yourself of this cult-like culture. Run if you can and don't look back.

3.0
May 29, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has a great reputation and gave me opportunities to meet people that I probably would not have otherwise. The training programs are pretty good as well.

Cons

I worked 80-90 hrs/week almost every week, which was okay because I loved what I did. But people at the top tended to not handle stress well and that trickled down. It seemed like respect only went one way, which I couldn't deal with. Additionally, a lot of people that work there think they are really smart or entitled, which is a joke. Lastly, there are tons of meetings that are really redundant but mandatory, which seemed like a waste of time given the amount of work that was usually yet to be done.

1.0
Feb 21, 2013

Run.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and health care coverage; however, my boss would never let me use them. I could never get out of the office for a doctor visit, so the benefits really weren't worth it. I left the firm with the maximum number of vacation days I didn't have time to use. I guess at least I get paid for them when I leave.

Cons

Every negative rumor you have heard is true. This is a sweatshop. Employees are shuffled around like interchangeable pawns in a chess game. The hours are TERRIBLE even though the people I interviewed with touted the company's "work/life balance". I was told that they only pay 1/2 time for overtime to discourage overtime hours. Not true. I have seen people who web-surf most of the day applauded for the long hours they were putting in. Appearances are everything and you can plan on 50 hours a week as a minimum if you are lucky enough to join a group that is well-staffed. I was micro-managed (though that will depend on your division) and in looking for a new position, found that in Utah, experience with Goldman Sachs actually HINDERED my job search - significantly. The years I spent here have been worthless to me. Their roles are highly "specialized" meaning that you learn nothing about the broader industry and are basically a ticket puncher doing the simplest menial tasks until they figure out a way to automate your role and you are moved to man another conveyor belt. When I asked to work only a 10 hour day ONE day a week for personal reasons, I was repeatedly NOT accommodated. You can completely forget about any medical accommodation for hours, though they won't hesitate to give you a footrest or seat cushion. They may support you in theory, but not in practice. Turnover is very high (they lure you by saying that it's a competitive environment for the brightest minds and that only the best endure - not reality) and I know several people who have chosen to be unemployed rather than continue to work at GS. I worked for Operations for 2 years before moving to the Investment Management Division. Within one year in the Investment Management Division, I got over 25 "farewell" emails from people leaving the firm. The firm is lowering it's hiring standards wherever they can and in most of the hiring discussions I witnessed, the only basis for a decision to hire was whether or not the most senior interviewer "liked" the person. They are hiring from all different backgrounds and experience (which they explain as "diversification") and grade point average do not matter anymore. This is no longer the organization that hires "the best of the best". In New York, you are hired if you are from the right family with the right contacts. In Utah, you are hired if they like you. No skill needed.

Viewing 76 - 78 of 19,405 Reviews

Glassdoor has 23,897 Goldman Sachs reviews submitted anonymously by Goldman Sachs employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Goldman Sachs is right for you.