Pros
Long-respected global reputation with strong legacy in Class-A office. Historically invested in experienced team members and benefited from their institutional knowledge for decades (though this commitment ended in 2025). Solid benefits and stability for those who align with senior leadership’s expectations.
Cons
Servant-class treatment. Accounting, engineering, and operations professionals are treated as support staff for asset managers, with limited voice, autonomy, or influence. Innovation discouraged. New ideas rarely gain traction; the culture rewards following instructions over problem-solving. Noncompetitive pay. Senior leaders continue to market the brand’s prestige as a substitute for competitive salaries. Emerging age bias. After many years valuing experienced staff, recent cost-cutting has shifted priorities toward lower-cost, less-experienced hires. Tone-deaf communication. Questioning decisions is seen as disloyal and phrases like “trust the process” get used in place of genuine dialogue. One-size-fits-all approach. Policies and procedures are rigidly applied across the board. Resistance to adaptation. When facing operational realities that demand faster, more flexible, or creative responses, leadership tends to fall back on outdated processes. Micromanagement. Day-to-day oversight is heavy-handed, with asset management often second-guessing experienced team members rather than trusting their judgment. Small decisions get escalated unnecessarily, slowing execution and eroding morale.