employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Morgan Stanley

Is this your company?

Morgan Stanley Associate Software Engineer reviews

4.0

95% would recommend to a friend

(48 total reviews)
avatar

Ted Pick

94% approve of CEO

84% positive business outlook

Associate Software Engineer Developer employees have rated Morgan Stanley with 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 48 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Associate Software Engineer Developer professionals have a good working experience there. Morgan Stanley is rated in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) by Associate Software Engineer Developer professionals compared to other employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

48 reviews
4.0
Jan 12, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good salaries and professional atmosphere.

Cons

Too traditional office setting. Have to come everyday and sit on the same place. No cafeteria, gyms, or anything and formal dresscode.

4.0
Jan 17, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of smart people who are very hardworking. They come from a variety of backgrounds and always give their best efforts. Employees and consultants are treated pretty much the same. If you're doing any kind of IT work, everyone is pretty much standardized and work is delegated based on technology and business experience. If you want to get the "best" work, you have to know everything about it beforehand. Compensation is good and also guaranteed. I used to work in an IB that didn't give me bonuses due to the small size of my team and my rank. MS gives you a cut end of story, but that doesn't mean it's good. Benefits are also good. You get decent coverage from the basic medical plans offered. Depending on your team and nature of your project, the work from home policy is pretty lax. A lot of co-workers have families and commute into the city so sometimes they need to be home.

Cons

Work can get repetitive. Many times I find myself doing a glorified refactoring of poorly written or poorly planned code. You'd think there would be an extensive process in check to prevent poor code from going into production, but that's not the case. Teams need to enforce their own code review and audit policies and sometimes that's difficult when you are trying to hit big deadlines. IT support staff could use some work. There are no doubt talented individuals who keep good notes and are very good at drilling down issue solutions, but that doesn't save QA overall from being a giant sink. I think the QA teams need to be closely situated with the developers and create their test-cases co-dependently so they can actually understand the software; otherwise, developers may as well be the first point of contact. Ranking and compensation improvement is slow. There's a big bureaucracy in place for promotions and it can be very frustrating to work year after year without seeing any improvement. Getting ahead requires you to be very social which is not always the easiest thing to do.

Viewing 43 - 45 of 48 Reviews

Glassdoor has 24,447 Morgan Stanley reviews submitted anonymously by Morgan Stanley employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Morgan Stanley is right for you.