PwC reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(75,226 total reviews)
avatar

Mohamed Kande

78% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

PwC has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 75,226 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The PwC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

75K reviews
1.0
Sep 22, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. It gives you a big initial Hike at the time of switching from a different organisation. 2. The average yearly hikes is the best in the market. 3. There is an year end break. 4. If one does not want to work, there is ample scope for that as even if you are allocated the work is not at all technical, demanding or time taking, let alone the unallocated case.

Cons

Phew...Its going to be a long long one. Please have some patience and read this very carefully and patiently as like YOU, I too was a young tech freak wanting to make a mark in the industry. But then...PwC happened. So here goes the list. 1. Lets start with the very job, the role that lures you into applying for this company. Please keep this in mind that the Job Description you will be seeing in the job ads or any other source , does not have any link with the task you will assigned. You will be crestfallen. Believe me its not a good feeling when you were hired for a technical role and the only thing you had to do was write proposals and make ppts for nonsensical stuffs. Whatever you had learnt in the past will be gone with the wind. 2. There are no projects. So you do not have any allocations all the year round. Do not be happy folks because here is where you will find the true colours of pwc work culture. BEWARE!!!!! PPTs and proposals are coming your way....All your seniors will be pounding you with all this nonsense. And to add to it people will ask you to write a white paper in 1 week time on a completely unknown topic. Now that is epic. And the best part of it is that some sycophants even come up with a white paper; would not comment any further on this. Also, all of a sudden your manager will tell you that tomorrow you have to appear for an interview on a completely unknown technology and you cannot refuse. 3. The most important and the most revolting one: The OFFICE CULTURE: Its totally rotten in here. Your seniors will not talk to you politely. Sometimes they might ridicule you in front of everyone. Your seniors will not work and have a gala time and you will be working like hell. 4. If you are one who is technically sound and does his work honestly then you are in for big trouble. Because you will be accorded average or below average rating. And do not even think of going to the HRs. They drink and dine together; your managers and HRs. 5. DO YOU WANT ANYTHING MORE?? IF YES, then you should probably join because even after reading all this you are in positive frame of mind for this company then YOU HAVE ALL THE QUALITIES OF BEING THE TRUE SERVANT OF THIS RIDICULOUS COMPANY.

1.0
Sep 27, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A brand name. That's It. Good firm if for you if you are a Bengali or can get married to one( I am serious).

Cons

There is nothing called a notice period. The 1 month, 2 month is all on paper. Your manager can hold you for as long as he wishes. The HR is is only a rubber stamp. Salary wise, you get peanuts compared to the efforts you have to put in.

1.0
Jun 14, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Free food 2. Flexibility 3. Social life

Cons

Congratulations, you are moving on to the next phase of the interview or you have already gotten your offer and you are contemplating... Is CSDC the PwC I've been dreaming of? Why is the recruitment procedure different? Here is a word of advice from someone who has been there! You are reading this negative post thinking: 1. This post is old, things must have changed 2. The author of this post is not a bright, motivated individual and I can do better 3. Regardless of the reality, I can move through the rankings really fast and transfer to "core" so I can endure the two years of misery 4. It's something I want to put on my resume. Here is my rebuttal for all. 1. This post is outdated: I am writing this post as of 6/14/2016, as long as Norm Brower is Managing Director, culture and system won't change. Mark my words 2. The author of this post is not a bright, motivated individual and I can do better: I graduated from a top 20 university MagnaCumLaude, I am a pro exam taker (never below 99th percentile for SAT, ACT, AP, MCAT), extremely motivated and driven. I know 'stats' don't correlate to how smart a person is, but everyone around me probably agrees that I am at least book smart. So yes, you can do better but I am not dim witted either. If I am book smart, then why did I take this job? Because there were no posts to properly guide me, like this one. Some things no one told me when I accepted the job: a. Most undergraduates enter the firm as associates (exempt). But you will enter the firm as a senior analyst, analyst, or specialist (all non exempt). b. People who are at core (those exempt associates) look down on you and treat you like second class citizens. c. The work is dull and mainly copy/paste (that is if you do have work to begin with) d. This didn't happen to me, but you might end up "on the bench" for 3+ months, which is a nice term for "wasting your life staring at the monitor for 40 hours a week." Now this is a problem for those who want to grow and learn e. Performance evaluations (snapshots) don't matter. You have to be on Norm's radar. It takes a lot of politics to be on Norm's radar (which leads to point f) f. Too much focus on "internal" projects: These are projects that rarely add value, people fight over and just for the sole purpose of getting on Norm's radar. 3. Regardless of the reality, I can move through the rankings really fast and transfer to "core" so I can endure the two years of misery: a. It takes two years to be able to apply. If that two years doesn't fall on August or January, you wait two years + extra months until August and January. b. Even after you wait until 2 years + August and January, a transfer is not guaranteed. Most people don't get it unless they have connections in core c. You can't move through the rankings fast even if you work assiduously on a client engagement. Believe me, I've taken calls at 6:30 p.m and the director wanted a deliverable by 11:59 p.m of the same day. Even with this attitude, you won't get promoted if you do not have a technical background (which is how you get on Norm's radar). Bear in mind, the director asks you these not because he thinks you are competent, but because he has no respect for CSDC employees 4. Companies you want to go to (MBB, Deloitte etc) know that the CSDC's employees are second class citizens. Your resume boost would be equal to that of an office assistant's at core. You can't hide that you are from the SDC because of the title analyst. Lastly, I would like to add that even if you do get a promotion and become a senior analyst, your salary increase is $2000/ yr, non negotiable. If you transfer to a new office (even NY), you take your salary with you to New York. Transfer does not mean pay raise. Bottom line, still high turnover rate and management makes you think you will have amazing work, but they can not live up to their words

Viewing 136 - 138 of 75,226 Reviews

Glassdoor has 105,581 PwC reviews submitted anonymously by PwC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PwC is right for you.