employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Trevor Project

Is this your company?

The Trevor Project reviews

2.7

41% would recommend to a friend

(201 total reviews)

Peggy Rajski

14% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

The Trevor Project has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 201 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Trevor Project employee rating is 28% below average for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

201 reviews
1.0
Jan 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people make it what it is. Too bad all the good ones are jumping ship.

Cons

Management is corrupt and rooted in nepotism.

1.0
Jan 14, 2023

Severance Agreement Includes Waiver of Rights for LGBTQ Discrimination

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Super cool, frontline staff. Some of the brightest people who sincerely want to help LGBTQ youth.

Cons

*Deceitful upper management *They wanted me to sign a Severance Agreement that stated I would sign my rights away under a state act that protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination. Not joking! *More interested in generating money. Trevor had millions of dollars in their surplus for one of the fiscal years. * The Trevor Project uses the minority stress model to structure their research. When I worked here, I asked a higher up about structuring their research on other frameworks. The higher up said, "I don't know how to do that." This organization is harmful to my community. The minority stress model is a framework that posits that marginalized individuals experience increased levels of stress due to the daily experiences of prejudice and discrimination they face, which can have negative effects on their mental and physical health. The model is often used in research on marginalized groups, such as the LGBT community. While the minority stress model can provide important insights into the experiences of marginalized individuals, there are some potential limitations and disadvantages to strictly using it to structure research on marginalized groups. One potential limitation is that the model can oversimplify the experiences of marginalized individuals by reducing them to the effects of discrimination and prejudice. It can also lead to a narrow focus on the negative experiences of marginalized groups and neglect other important factors that may shape their lives, such as resilience and coping mechanisms. Another limitation is that the model does not take into account the diversity within marginalized groups and may not accurately reflect the experiences of all individuals within that group. This can lead to a lack of understanding of the nuances and complexities of the experiences of marginalized individuals. Additionally, the model may also reinforce the idea that marginalized individuals are inherently vulnerable and in need of protection, rather than as active agents capable of resistance and resilience. It's important to note that the minority stress model is a useful framework for understanding the experiences of marginalized groups, but it's important to consider other perspectives and frameworks as well, and to take into account the diversity and complexity of the experiences of marginalized individuals. Labeling theory is the belief that when society consistently tells a group "you are this" then people become that. It's akin to marketing telling women they are ugly and need the latest cream. They internalize the messaging and then believe they need the cream. Telling queer youth they are weak and vulnerable (rather than resilient or focusing on other protective factors) causes queer youth to internalize this belief. Which invariably harms my community. This organization is evil. It's mostly a business as evidenced by their corporate-like structure, accepting millions of dollars from giant companies, and having brand deals to sell products.

3.0
Jan 5, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Frontline workers are compassionate, bright, competent and so deeply invested in their work to care for youth. There’s a wealth of knowledge, skill and lived experience within the workforce. I felt such a deep sense of belonging and love for my team members that I’ve never felt in any other role.

Cons

Completely neglectful, antagonistic and incompetent upper management. They recently hired several cisgender, older white folks to leadership positions who are laying morale and the mission to waste. They are abusive to frontline workers, condescending, and allow misconduct to run rampant throughout the org until internal uprisings occur. I was traumatized by my final months there.

Viewing 106 - 108 of 201 Reviews

Glassdoor has 223 The Trevor Project reviews submitted anonymously by The Trevor Project employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Trevor Project is right for you.