Wood Mackenzie reviews

3.3

57% would recommend to a friend

(884 total reviews)
avatar

Jason Liu

49% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Wood Mackenzie has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 884 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Wood Mackenzie employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Administración y consultoría industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

884 reviews
2.0
Feb 28, 2015

From an all encompassing love affair to a nasty divorce.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many great people Excellent knowledge and experience Great pension and industry standard benefits Client focus on the front line

Cons

Increasingly political Strategic confusion - one restructure after another and blind faith in management consultants Not listening to feedback from existing staff Treating loyal employees poorly Failing to manage talent No clear people planning and your experience will depend entirely on your line manager Lack of consistency in line management standards Too many middle and senior managers playing the game and unwilling to rock the boat

1.0
Feb 21, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Still a lot of good people to learn from Good place to get industry experience Good place to get industry contacts

Cons

Increasingly dysfunctional and political corporate culture. Serious shortages of resource in key areas. Staff cuts have decimated key departments, even those with strong revenue growth. It has now hit a point where after a long term problem of under investing in staff there are serious questions as to whether the company can carry on delivering content to clients. At the same time the company is hiring significant numbers of staff who are frankly pointless. Key senior staff are increasingly backing away from key departments as the situation spirals out of control. The commodities industries are become much more cautious about dealing with research companies like wm and others after recent oil prices falls. Combining that with serious cuts to staffing is proving to be problematic for renewals. Good staff are not rewarded and are increasingly treated badly,Good staff members are often burnt out. Staff turnover has now gotten out of control. Where the company traditionally had a turnover rate of less than 10% in key departments that number has now gone past 20% and is still rising. What's worse is those staff who leave are now often not replaced.

2.0
Jan 26, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Excellent benefits package (401k, health/dental insurance, vacation allowance) -Pretty casual work environment, filled with generally interesting and smart colleagues -Managers are flexible with what you do with your time. You can take time to do research or write a report on nearly whatever you want, as long as its related to your area and reasonably interesting. Though this isn't quite as good as it once was as we are getting saddled with more and more responsibilities (without any extra pay or thanks) and less time to do the research we want. -Adequate pay (once you take into account the benefits, relaxed environment and often 40-45 hr weeks)

Cons

-Management is a mess. Managers seem to be promoted based mainly on time served and having similar beliefs as existing managers, with qualifications taking a backseat. -Top management is totally focused on a near term IPO so they and other senior employees can cash out, at the expense of current work product. They are trying to do too much and do it too quickly in order to drive growth. -The company operates on an unspoken code of secrecy and things are often on a “need to know” basis and are passed to analysts only once decisions have already been made. -No analyst development programme. Also, goals in performance reviews are rather meaningless as ratings seem to be based on managerial preference and speed of progression between bands is inconsistent between a few chosen analysts and everybody else. -Research turnover has increased significantly in the past couple years which strains already overextended analysts. -Private equity ownership for the past few years has led to severe underinvestment in business processes, which results in inefficiency and an incredible amount of wasted time. The beyond awful IT systems fit in here. I feel bad for the guys responsible for supporting the unstable Jenga tower that is our IT system.

Viewing 832 - 834 of 884 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,026 Wood Mackenzie reviews submitted anonymously by Wood Mackenzie employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Wood Mackenzie is right for you.