employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Wildlife Fund

Is this your company?

World Wildlife Fund reviews

3.8

74% would recommend to a friend

(735 total reviews)
avatar

Carter S. Roberts

88% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

World Wildlife Fund has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 735 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The World Wildlife Fund employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

735 reviews
1.0
May 5, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A great place to work if you're from the UK. That's about it.

Cons

Anyone not from the UK need not apply. The staff and management are shamelessly chauvinistic toward anyone not British. It's a british-expat import business, basically. If they do hire you, you'll find your English mocked, you'll be passed over for promotions and you'll work on the least important projects. You'll be constantly reminded the you don't measure up on account your weren't born in the UK. Anti-semitism and homophobia are also common. And if you complain to their HR department. They will simply show you the door.

4.0
Apr 28, 2015

Rewarding Experience

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The organization works on diverse and exciting projects all over the world.

Cons

Not many full time positions available.

1.0
Apr 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WWF has flexible work hours. Employees are generally smart & hardworking colleagues. It is in a good location and and has strong brand recognition.

Cons

WWF is in bumbling through a massive reorganization and severe layoffs, leaving the organization in self-induced chaos. Staff morale is abysmal. High-performing colleagues who asked difficult questions were almost universally laid off. Many staff who were initially fired have now been invited back, a symptom of deeper flaws within the reorganization process. (Most are declining the 'opportunity' to continue with the organization.) Layoffs preceded strategic planning, so remaining employees are now charged with developing projects and programs without key personnel. Workloads for remaining employees are ridiculous, sometimes dumping 2 and even 3 full-time positions onto a single individual. And now the architects of the reorg are being fired, in a last-ditch effort to salvage things (or perhaps find a scapegoat).

Viewing 694 - 696 of 735 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,276 World Wildlife Fund reviews submitted anonymously by World Wildlife Fund employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Wildlife Fund is right for you.