AECOM reviews

3.7

69% would recommend to a friend

(11,146 total reviews)
avatar

Troy Rudd

79% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

AECOM has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 11,146 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AECOM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Servicios de construcción, reparación y mantenimiento industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

11K reviews
2.0
Apr 19, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Global company - You can transfer to other operating companies within the world. 2) They pay for benefits - 401k (3% - note they use 50% of 6%), different health insurance, different dental insurance, different eye insurance. 3) They do pay for some career advancements (PE, PG, Tuition Reimbursement) 4) 9/80 Schedule now

Cons

1) If you're not management, you're a grunt. Being a grunt, your life is total misery. You will wonder when your next project is or you will be overloaded with projects that have ridiculous deadline. 2) They will work you to a dog for a mediocre salary. They want near 100% utilization when many historic companies have some staff who are admin (ie 0% utilization) 3) Project managers are "coerced" to come under/near budget with flawless accounting, resulting in the people who work on the projects for far more for less billable hours given (IE 5 hours of work, 2 billable hours) 4) They hardly lay off corporate but they lay off a lot of office staff. (Do we really need 300 + corporate lawyers, a new weekly newsletter congratulation some B.S. corporate position)' 5) There is no organic growth for AECOM, it's all acquisitions - majority of the profits go to paying off the companies we acquire.

1.0
Apr 19, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice stable govermnent contracts when the government is looking to spend money and congress isn't trying to slash every state project. Good people for the most part who have the capability tio treat you like a professional

Cons

AECOM PDD in Arlington, VA otherwise known the National Capital Office (NCO) is a collection several recently acquired AE/EA firms. Having its foundation as DMJM design, there was eventually a collocation of with recently acquired Hayes, Sean, Mattern & Mattern (HSSM). Eventually there will also be a full collocation of former Ellerbe Becket as well. With a total staff of just around 350 employees mostly architects and engineers, there was the expected challenge of trying to integrate the ideas of all other cultures into one identity. This would be a huge undertaking - one that would require the right leadership and management. Unfortunately, instead of integration, management chose a more dangerous path. The "collocation" turned into an all out clash of civilizations. Much of the management became hostile and certain leadership roles were given to favorites. Also other leadership roles were superseded (i.e. DMJM which is a far more reputable firm had its management side-stepped by that of HSMM) and there was soon another wave of aggressive politics to bring Ellerbe Becket's leadership into prominence as well. By late 2010 there were some truly ugly corporation politics. People were stabbing each other in the back left and right - anything to justify the existence of one another in the midst of a rapidly evaporating workload. Leaders who you expected to act professional were not and in one nauseating scene there was a complete unprofessional breakdown of several of the firms principals for not being invited to a client meetings. This of course happened right in front of the entire team of people who were working late - well past regular business hours. Where there was once a very outstanding group of professionals turned into a cesspool of immature, unprofessional, overzealous, self-serving scoundrels, and maybe their most occasional critic. Unsurprisingly, there were a string of promotions to some of the most woefully unqualified individuals. Clients were literally shocked when they would be introduced as "Principals" or "Vice-Presidents." It gets even worse. There was a lot hiring even during the Great Recession but only of senior level personnel who were brought in with the idea they could bring in additional work. This created an extremely top-heavy organization that carried merely a handful of junior-level architects and a smattering of mid-level people. The later ones would constantly be in the line of fire when there is poor workload forecasting - if that makes any sense. A lot of very good talent was lost. Therefore, when you would spend five days in a row working around the clock towards a deadline, that person doing much of the production would instantly be treated like dirt and cast aside when that phase of the work was finished. Then to add insult to injury, that person would also get lectured on using "way too many hours" on the project even though they were asked to do their job. So in turn, in order to justify the existence of Senior level staff that supposedly manage projects, they throw their production people under the buss constantly so that they can use of all of the project's available hours for themselves. It has become a perfectly accepted practice at AECOM and completely overlooked by management that is more than in cahoots with this ugly way of conducting business. It came to a point where I was being asked by my supposed "Studio Manager" to lie about my hours. Unacceptable. Layoffs started around (you guessed it) Christmas Eve! Basically you already had a relatively beaten down and demoralized workforce facing the grim reality that they would be next in the line of fire. And by January 2011 about 2 or three people were getting the axe per week (it is April now and this has continued). It created an ugly political and cultural atmosphere where there was once a positive environment became a dreadful place to come to work. Everyone was on pins and needles and production took a huge hit, gossip and fear mongering became rampant, people started to step all over eachother - and of course upper management seamed only to encourage the madness as they continue to sink even further as an organization. Astonishingly some of the other organizations that AECOM views as "competitors" (Gensler, HOK, Aedas, RTKL, SOM, etc) were hiring people.

2.0
Mar 31, 2011

A culture shock.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

An ambitious and growing organisation with big plans for the future. Global opportunities for career progression and development.

Cons

As an organisation AECOM is constantly growing and attempting to implement its own systems and at the same time absorb others. It can be confusing at times and actually getting things done can be difficult.

Viewing 11017 - 11019 of 11,146 Reviews

Glassdoor has 12,609 AECOM reviews submitted anonymously by AECOM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AECOM is right for you.