employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Resources Institute

Engaged Employer

Junior staff - your voice does not matter here - Anonymous employee World Resources Institute Employee Review

1.0
Sep 20, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very talented people work here to learn from.

Cons

You'll often here the organization claim to be "flat" - meaning you can take your concerns and voice them to senior leadership - but it couldn't be further from the truth. The hierarchy others have mentioned, favoritism, and value only being given to senior positions make this a tough place for junior staff with little upward mobility or care for your quality of life - you are replaceable. A common complaint across teams was that the managers are highly intelligent but lack the training to be people managers. I had a terrible relationship with my manager, as had past people in my position and any other staff who interacted with my manager - my manager was never trained to be a manager, had no vision for the team, behaved unethically in more than one occasion, and yet was well-connected to senior leadership and continued to take on new staff and opportunities. On my small salary I worked 60+ hours a week on average, had no opportunities for advancement, and despite complaints from multiple people to HR and senior leadership about my manager, nothing changed. Across the group I worked in, 90% quit within the same year all with similar complaints about leadership, yet nothing was changed because there are enough entry-level people in the DC workforce looking for jobs.

Explore other reviews about World Resources Institute

5.0
May 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Cons

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Cons

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All