employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Resources Institute

Engaged Employer

Dream employer working in the intersection between environment and development - Research Analyst World Resources Institute Employee Review

5.0
Jun 4, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WRI was my dream destination post-graduating from university. The cutting edge place at the intersection between environmental and development issues. Staff are very bright, international and progressive, senior management is accessible and willing to listen to ideas if you are bold enough to reach out to them. Programs are very diverse and WRI's reputation is solid in the field. Always consistently trying to improve itself. esp now with the new strategic refresh initiatives from the new president.

Cons

Staff tend to focus too much on fundraising. Need a new and more flexible funding mechanism. Due to project-specific funding, it is very difficult for staff to change projects or to work outside a narrow field of specialty. Silo-ed organization. Little interaction between programs and projects Staff turnover extremely high

Explore other reviews about World Resources Institute

5.0
May 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Cons

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Cons

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All