employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Resources Institute

Engaged Employer

Experience varies by team - Senior Project Manager World Resources Institute Employee Review

4.0
Jun 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Respected organization Get to contribute to meaningful, evidence based research and project implementation Many teams have great work life balance; good paid leave in the context of the US Growing fast, can offer exciting opportunities Passionate and collaborative colleagues for the most part, a low drama and intellectually humble work culture

Cons

Professional advancement is not straightforward regardless of performance, and there is no clarity as to the criteria or opportunities for promotion. Managers have no incentive to invest in the growth of staff and in general, management and mentorship are not valued skill sets. This gives individual managers almost total control over the prospects and experience of staff. In addition, staff uncertainty around career trajectory discourages risk taking. Siloed work means it can also be harder to move laterally than in some other organizations. Pay is low and adheres to a nontransparent “equity based” system that prevents staff from revisiting their pay or receiving raises on the basis of expanded responsibility. New employees are offered higher salaries than incumbents make for the same work. HR is extremely antagonistic and traditional for an organization that purports to be cutting edge and invested in valuing its employees. Struggling to find its niche/unique offer as the climate space grows.

Explore other reviews about World Resources Institute

5.0
May 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Cons

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Cons

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All