employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Resources Institute

Engaged Employer

Has potential, but most is wasted on poor senior management and administrative team - Project Coordinator World Resources Institute Employee Review

2.0
Apr 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting work. Well-regarded institution. Projects depend on successful proposals, so there can be flexibility in the topics and type of work a team does. Young staff (coordinators and some managers) are well-prepared and friendly, there's a good atmosphere.

Cons

Your experience depends a lot on your manager. Many senior staff members have lost interest in work and projects and they become an additional financial burden for the team, they provide little value and are grossly overpayed. Very high admin fees, adding overhead and other charges, it amounts to more than 42%, making many projects unviable. Toxic culture, favoritism. HR is not interested in employees, very high turnover rate. Little possibility of promotions. People who work well are overexploited, while bad workers get no repercussions. Very high organization cost but it's not reflected on key employees salaries.

Explore other reviews about World Resources Institute

5.0
May 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work - wonderful colleagues

Cons

Structure does not always meet individual needs

4.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-driven work - Smart , friendly and passionate colleagues - Global impact - Collaborative culture - Strong reputation — Flexible / progressive work environment - Innovation-oriented Diverse international perspective A leadership that cares: the global leadership stepped in when U.S. funding was unexpectedly canceled, providing financial support for several programs for a few months to give teams time to secure new funding sources.

Cons

Resource constraints affecting efficiency: working with limited staffing and budgets sometimes made it challenging to execute projects efficiently Compensation compared to the private sector: salaries are noticeably lower than for private-sector roles, which is especially challenging in a city like NYC. Project direction influenced by funding priorities: I noticed that donor and grant priorities often shaped the direction of projects. Career progression tied to funding cycles: advancement opportunities often depended on program funding rather than purely on performance.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All