Goldman Sachs reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(19,406 total reviews)
avatar

David M. Solomon

63% approve of CEO

66% positive business outlook

Goldman Sachs has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 19,406 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Goldman Sachs employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

19K reviews
5.0
Oct 7, 2015

Analyst (Finance)

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great pay/salary, management is very supportive of your growth, ability to work from home on occasion (depending on your manager), prestigious name on resume, very nice building/facilities (NYC), no micromanagement, you're treated like a professional

Cons

Work/life balance, extremely cutthroat environment, too focused on appearances at times, always need to be accessible via email, outdated technology, projects sometimes lack a clear direction

3.0
Apr 15, 2015

Resume booster

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Big name and this is filler text because I have to type 20 words and I really don't have anything else to type as there isn't any.

Cons

* Firing people and layoff is natural * Unless you are in upper level, compensation is not competitive * Terrible hours, which is expected * Culture is about equivalent to funeral reception, you are here for a business and that is all you will do

2.0
Sep 24, 2014

Bureaucracy at its best; Heroism at its worst

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A meritocracy (for the most part). Pockets of very intelligent people. Global breadth and diversity. Interesting personalities. Compensation can be good (depending on your rank).

Cons

Limited growth, influence, longevity, upside outside of New York/New Jersey. If you want a long-term career at GS you better be in NY/NJ otherwise you'll always be second-class citizen in regional offices. Jack Welch 80-20 curve system. Performance reviews play a factor in determining your quartile. Unless you're in the top 2 quartiles, you're severely limited in terms of compensation, promote-ability, mobility - for YEARS (last 2+ years of quartile rank is questioned so have a bad year and you've set yourself back a minimum of 2 years). A lot of closed-door negotiation happens to shift people in and out of quadrant ranks and it has little to do with their performance review. Incredibly slow-moving in terms of progress because of the layers upon layers of bureaucracy and antiquated systems and processes. Unwillingness of technology senior management to negotiate with their business partners and push back on unrealistic demands on ever-constricting and conflicted supply. Lack of planning or commitment to quality results in an expectation of longer hours, on-call status, and overall acts of heroism. In terms of Technology, GS is about 2-5 years behind the mainstream; lots of legacy systems, code, mindsets, skills, practices, procedures. It's easy to be come technologically irrelevant the longer one stays at GS in a Technology role. Widespread hubris. Most of the senior managers have been at GS for their entire careers (20+ years) and therefore a "not-invented-here" attitude is apparent. Some of the highest concentrations of egocentrics you'll find, anywhere.

Viewing 91 - 93 of 19,406 Reviews

Glassdoor has 23,898 Goldman Sachs reviews submitted anonymously by Goldman Sachs employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Goldman Sachs is right for you.