employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Innovations for Poverty Action

Is this your company?

Innovations for Poverty Action reviews

3.6

63% would recommend to a friend

(244 total reviews)
avatar

Annie Duflo

82% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Innovations for Poverty Action has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 244 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Innovations for Poverty Action employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

244 reviews
1.0
Oct 23, 2015

Evaluation Coordinator

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

High-Profile Professors, Inside View Into the World of RCTs, (False) Feeling that you are doing something good in the world. Recognition for working at "the" place in Development Economics.

Cons

I am pretty sure that the only positive reviews on here about IPA are from the PIs, those that then did graduate work at Harvard or M.I.T. or from Dean Karlan himself. It is also seems like the structure, compensation, and management practices at this organization would be illegal, at least if everything was done in the U.S.. I am quite surprised that they have endured for this many number of years. The mid-level and upper level management is a disaster at best, and the only thing that is worse than them lying to employees (especially local staff which is just appalling) is you realize that in order to cope with their integrity and ethics failings, they are lying to themselves. Some of the organization's practices that I have seen in the field have made me feel that I am a lesser human being, and yet when you bring them up with management you are told that this is the way that things are run in these types of environments which is completely degrading. Also, if you have not read the numerous other posts about salary and work-life balance, here is a thought – you work investment banking hours (80-100 hours a week) for compensation that would pay you about 2 dollars an hour in some cases when you factor everything into the equation, just to get a letter for a Ph.D. program, which is not a given especially if you work for well-known PIs that do not want to dilute their recommendations. I wish I had a time-machine to not have accepted the role and done anything else.

3.0
Feb 21, 2015

Lots of growth potential but lacks management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In most positions you have a lot of responsibility with little oversight which means that if you're a self starter and you learn by doing you will grow a lot. The breadth and depth of exposure would be hard to find elsewhere.

Cons

The org lacks management capacity and if you need constructive feedback from a supervisor to feel like you're on the right track, you probably won't get it (unless you happen to have a good manager). The organization itself does not value management skills and therefore most managers do not know how to manage their supervises properly. There is a lot of talk about IPA's people being its greatest asset but that sentiment is not reflected in company salaries, benefits or decision-making processes. The culture is about working like a dog and then moving on to a phd program. Tenure, hard work, dedication are not particularly recognized or rewarded so turnover and dissatisfaction are high.

2.0
Sep 11, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some people love working for IPA so they are really into their work, which is exciting and fun to be around. You can get lots of responsibility. The people are very smart and fun and there is a good work culture, if you're into the work/life balance leaning more to the work side.

Cons

There is very little guidance given and the organization is poorly run. Compensation is very low. Not a lot of understanding and a lot of the work you do is over email which can be difficult. The main thing is that, outside of running surveys, there isn't much in terms of training you in how to work within the environment and what you have to do, so it's like you have to learn on the job with nobody telling you how to do things correctly. You never hear when you've done something well, only when you've screwed up, which is bound to happen since there isn't proper training for non-survey work.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 244 Reviews

Glassdoor has 353 Innovations for Poverty Action reviews submitted anonymously by Innovations for Poverty Action employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Innovations for Poverty Action is right for you.