employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Resources Institute

Engaged Employer

World Resources Institute reviews

4.0

83% would recommend to a friend

(391 total reviews)

Ani Dasgupta

83% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

World Resources Institute has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 391 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The World Resources Institute employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

391 reviews
2.0
Aug 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fantastic colleagues, just a great group of humans. Greatest strength of the organization is a group of brilliant, passionate people that really care about the work we do who form the backbone of the organization (probably the main reason they put up with senior management). Work place culture is one that reflects the organization, balances the crunchy with the pragmatic. Respected research reputation that you can leverage for a better job or grad school. Average or slightly above average pay and benefits for a large nonprofit. Comm

Cons

Cannot underscore this enough, HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE management. The CFO is one of the most arrogant and disrespectful people I've ever met AND I LIVE IN DC! In the 2+ years I've been at WRI I have no idea what the HR dept does! The program PCs do all of the hiring (candidate screening, interviews, on-boarding, visa processing). They do hand out of file forms, that's something I guess. Senior management loves to issue internal policy changes by decree without asking for input on implementation from staff that actually are responsible for implementing the policies. If you're applying to be a Project Coordinator, DO NOT TAKE IT! I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy. You will be treated as a second class citizen in an organization that has two castes, researchers and project admin. You will enter as a wide-eyed, 20 something and leave burnt out and jaded. If you're applying to be a Research Asst/Analyst, CAVEAT EMPTOR! See above. Although you're in the higher caste, your lot is only marginally better mostly because you don't have to deal with WRI's dysfunctional administrative structure as much. You're probably just coming out of that Masters program and think you're ready to make a difference, THIS PLACE IS NOT IT! You're likely going to be treated as a glorified secretary, proofreading, writing, gophering while under intense pressure to work long hours you can't legally be compelled to work but are shamed if you don't. The best case scenario here is that you can leverage this position into a jump up the chain at another organization.

3.0
Aug 6, 2015

Research Analyst

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great platform for policy research; Creative environment; Talent coworkers; Good benefits; work-life balance;

Cons

Researchers receive the same salaries as program coordinators/managers; Junior researchers receives lots of responsibilities which is great, but they receive the same salaries as program coordinators; Unprofessional management; personal development might be interrupted if your manager leaves the organization; hierarchical organization, very long decision making process, more directors/managers than researchers;

2.0
Jul 28, 2015

Amazing staff, Unprofessional Management

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I can echo what 99% of these reviews are saying - amazing, talented, passionate staff members with serious expertise in their fields. Networking opportunities are great as you are exposed to many related international organizations. Benefits are good. Flexible hours.

Cons

Management is really, really bad. It's also a large reason why Junior level staff have little to no growth opportunity and end up leaving - there are hardly any tangible gauges for performance assessment in this company as it is largely subjective (as is the delegation of work). If there is a gap in a team's knowledge base, rather than invest in staff who are interested in taking on professional development work to gain new skills and fill it, the solution is usually to hire someone new. Additionally, many staff are overloaded with meetings, many of which return little to no action items as a result. There is considerable sitting around and chatting about things, with nothing getting done. There is tendency to focus on getting big name organizations in the industry to become a "partner" with them, rather than the focus on the projects at hand and having a measurable impact, and the lack of motivation to conduct proper, through research, at times sacrificing scientific accuracy and quality in favor of putting out a flashy end product as quickly as possible. From what I understand, WRI was once a research driven think-tank, but it seems to have adopted a "more talking, less doing" operation over the years, at least in my impression. It is a place that people use as a stepping stone rather than somewhere to put roots.

Viewing 358 - 360 of 391 Reviews

Glassdoor has 596 World Resources Institute reviews submitted anonymously by World Resources Institute employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Resources Institute is right for you.