employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Is this your company?

International Rescue Committee reviews

3.8

70% would recommend to a friend

(1,408 total reviews)
avatar

David Miliband

71% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

International Rescue Committee has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 1,408 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The International Rescue Committee employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
3.0
Jan 24, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

IRC has a broad impact and strong programming in places that need it most. The organization is well respected in the humanitarian community as hiring very qualified people--smart and dedicated. People seem to most like either working in the field or in senior management at the HQ level. IRC seems to be continuing to grow.

Cons

IRC is often more reactive than proactive so it often felt like playing catch-up, which perhaps is the nature for working for a humanitarian organization. It is extremely difficult to get a job unless you know someone who can get your application out of the depths of HR. IRC is generally regarded as one of the lower-paying NGOs and staff benefits and recognition are lacking. Staff are very overworked and because of the NGO, emergency response nature, many staff seemed to almost compete to be considered the most overworked/dedicated. Hard to get promoted because of power structures, politics, and high competition for positions.

2.0
Oct 2, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Once the organization offered a well-recognized name, stable work, reasonable pay, and solid benefits (including health insurance and a decent—though not exceptional—vacation package).

Cons

Unfortunately, that stability has disappeared. The company was first shaken by reduced government funding and later by a series of poor leadership decisions. In recent years, its vision has become increasingly disconnected from reality. Roles are often filled by individuals who are not fully qualified or the right fit, while highly skilled employees have been laid off through multiple rounds of cuts. This has caused morale and motivation across teams to drop significantly. The organization no longer feels aligned with the values it promotes, and its overall direction is unclear.

3.0
May 24, 2025

HQ does not live up to values espoused publicly

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, flexible hybrid schedule for staff who is not client facing.

Cons

Significantly underpaid at the local level; staff who have lived experience are often the least paid and most exploited; values espoused regularly by HQ for clients are not experienced by staff; leadership unwilling to deal with pending federal administration changes and plan accordingly until it's too late, and handled mass lay offs with secrecy and isolation; HQ propped up bad local leadership and refused to listen to staff experience and input, even when local leadership *literally* fell asleep on the job; certain operations/development staff deeply overworked

Viewing 103 - 105 of 1,408 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,215 International Rescue Committee reviews submitted anonymously by International Rescue Committee employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if International Rescue Committee is right for you.