employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Morgan Stanley

Is this your company?

Morgan Stanley reviews

3.9

75% would recommend to a friend

(19,833 total reviews)
avatar

Ted Pick

80% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Morgan Stanley has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 19,833 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Morgan Stanley employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

20K reviews
3.0
Jul 2, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. They will pay you far beyond your expectations. 2. Very good brand value. 3. No variable pay, work from home, cab facility, very good yearly bonus etc. 4. Occasional training on new technologies will help you upgrade your skills. 5. Supportive leadership team (ED level) .

Cons

1. They will say that they care about work-life balance but u will find yourself working late nights very frequently. 2. All they will care about is work and delivery. Very high process oriented, just a line of change will take u 20 days to push to higher environments. And this processes will make u mad everyday. 3. They will just fire you if you do a mistake with out giving u a second chance to prove yourself. 4. Apart from occasional training, most of the projects (at least 75%) are very old and have very less scope to apply ur knowledge. It is a bank, they don't care about technology and technical people, all they care about is money. 5. Apart from leadership team, most of the management team (VP level) are very little techies and wont listen to ur suggestions for improvements in technology or processes. 6. If you don't want to saturate ur technical skills and want to grow technically, don't join an Investment Bank. 7. After all boot-licking will get u to top level position in no-time.

1.0
Dec 19, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice analyst group, collegiate, friendly.

Cons

Line managers are mostly embittered long-timers who have never been promoted in rank due to inadequate work morale, insufficient drive, and lacking motivation and ability to motivate. Their managers in turn are often too young, and too busy with machinating their next step up the career ladder than acting like good managers. Responsibility never lies with them and they always look to blame their direct reports for anything that goes wrong. The buck never stops with them. They are also generally unknowledgeable of the day-to-day work that goes on and the systems utilized, much to their own peril and thus they speak in ignorance readily and with great arrogance. They don't understand the limitations and flaws of the outdated and primitive systems in use, and rather than find solutions, or change what is flawed, they insist that it's always been so and if it ain't broke... (yeah, it's only technically not broken, in any self-respecting organization such primitive and contrived work-arounds to outdated garbage would be considered what they are: disasters in the making) They are also often prone to contradictory orders and statements on policy/practice/regulations. Support from bottom-end management is entirely lacking, and politics and a vicious blame-culture are palpable on a daily basis. Direct and clear communication is almost non-existent, and the passive-aggressive office culture means that verbal communication is rare and not valid, almost everything must be put in electronic form. Just don't expect it be to be clear or explicit. Instead, get used to having to read between lines and deduce information. Do not expect any support and orientation in a new role. You will not get it. Documentation is nonexistent. Most things are taught inadequately by being shown at lightning speed once and then corrected slowly as the inevitable mistakes are made. Line managers will not grant you permission to stay later to complete work but they themselves will excuse themselves to show up late and leave early on a regular basis. This is what is called work-life balance. The work itself across operations is for the most part tedious, monotonous, intellectually stultifying, and only difficult because of poor systems, inefficient work processes that are impervious to improvement and change, and the lack of support from management. The organization at large is full of people at the lowest rank who have been there too long, have been beaten up and demotivated too much, and feel unappreciated and underpaid compared to the competition.

3.0
Sep 12, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One advantage of working there was the quality of the people. Since it's difficult to get into Morgan Stanley, you'll work with very smart people. Benefits are good, but pay is only good if you work in a revenue-focused role, with salaries and bonuses for other areas off significantly in recent years vs. its competitors

Cons

Like other Firms on Wall St., there is still a "partnership model", with a heavy focus on rank (e.g. Managing Directors are most important). Getting promoted can be very political, and involves having good timing and a strong sponsor, and is less about ability.

Viewing 154 - 156 of 19,833 Reviews

Glassdoor has 24,411 Morgan Stanley reviews submitted anonymously by Morgan Stanley employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Morgan Stanley is right for you.