employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Trevor Project

Is this your company?

The Trevor Project reviews

2.7

41% would recommend to a friend

(200 total reviews)

Peggy Rajski

14% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

The Trevor Project has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 200 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Trevor Project employee rating is 28% below average for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

200 reviews
1.0
Jan 14, 2023

Severance Agreement Includes Waiver of Rights for LGBTQ Discrimination

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Super cool, frontline staff. Some of the brightest people who sincerely want to help LGBTQ youth.

Cons

*Deceitful upper management *They wanted me to sign a Severance Agreement that stated I would sign my rights away under a state act that protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination. Not joking! *More interested in generating money. Trevor had millions of dollars in their surplus for one of the fiscal years. * The Trevor Project uses the minority stress model to structure their research. When I worked here, I asked a higher up about structuring their research on other frameworks. The higher up said, "I don't know how to do that." This organization is harmful to my community. The minority stress model is a framework that posits that marginalized individuals experience increased levels of stress due to the daily experiences of prejudice and discrimination they face, which can have negative effects on their mental and physical health. The model is often used in research on marginalized groups, such as the LGBT community. While the minority stress model can provide important insights into the experiences of marginalized individuals, there are some potential limitations and disadvantages to strictly using it to structure research on marginalized groups. One potential limitation is that the model can oversimplify the experiences of marginalized individuals by reducing them to the effects of discrimination and prejudice. It can also lead to a narrow focus on the negative experiences of marginalized groups and neglect other important factors that may shape their lives, such as resilience and coping mechanisms. Another limitation is that the model does not take into account the diversity within marginalized groups and may not accurately reflect the experiences of all individuals within that group. This can lead to a lack of understanding of the nuances and complexities of the experiences of marginalized individuals. Additionally, the model may also reinforce the idea that marginalized individuals are inherently vulnerable and in need of protection, rather than as active agents capable of resistance and resilience. It's important to note that the minority stress model is a useful framework for understanding the experiences of marginalized groups, but it's important to consider other perspectives and frameworks as well, and to take into account the diversity and complexity of the experiences of marginalized individuals. Labeling theory is the belief that when society consistently tells a group "you are this" then people become that. It's akin to marketing telling women they are ugly and need the latest cream. They internalize the messaging and then believe they need the cream. Telling queer youth they are weak and vulnerable (rather than resilient or focusing on other protective factors) causes queer youth to internalize this belief. Which invariably harms my community. This organization is evil. It's mostly a business as evidenced by their corporate-like structure, accepting millions of dollars from giant companies, and having brand deals to sell products.

2.0
Oct 27, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At the lower levels, people are kind, generous and care about supporting LGBTQ youth in crisis. You can find a queer work community here. Many of those people do great work, and you can find ways to do great work at the individual contributor level if you are able to navigate or ignore the politics.

Cons

The only thing that matters at this organization is scale scale scale. The CEO wants to serve literally 2 million youth in a year, but does not care about the quality of that service or youth experience - he only cares about the numbers going up. It is like working for a for profit company that wants to get bigger and bigger without the pay and bonus structures. You will work 55+ hours in a week at every level, and be told to put on a smile on while you do it, even when you are burnt out. The CEO is the worst leader I have ever worked under. He is incapable of communicating a vision that unifies the ever expanding team, and he micromanages through his Executive Team to get exactly what he wants done done, regardless of metrics and evidence showing that his pet strategies are terrible. The exec team is made up of yes people who just do what the CEO wants them to do. The Trevor Project has a great brand and a ton of goodwill from the LGBTQ community, but think twice before going to work there. Remind yourself that in our capitalist society, a brand is nothing more than a sales pitch that can be used to cover up any number of underlying issues. Nowhere is that truer than at the Trevor Project.

5.0
Jan 30, 2022

Best Working Experience I've had

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Full-Time yet Flexible Schedules. Decent Pay Company culture is amazing, we all do our best to get along. Management is very supportive, Criticism of work is always constructive. Supervisors generally try to make sure that counselors are working effectively but are also getting the support needed to perform the job.

Cons

None noticed as of now.

Viewing 37 - 39 of 200 Reviews

Glassdoor has 222 The Trevor Project reviews submitted anonymously by The Trevor Project employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Trevor Project is right for you.