Wipro reviews

I am writing to share my experience as a former employee of Wipro, in the hope that it may assist others in making informed decisions and encourage appropriate oversight of the company's practices. As a U.S. citizen, I believe I was treated unfairly during my tenure at Wipro. I observed a clear pattern of preferential treatment toward H-1B visa holders and employees of Indian origin. This bias appeared to influence project assignments, internal opportunities, and overall employee treatment. When my project ended, I was not offered any follow-up interviews or reassignment opportunities, despite the company’s stated bench policy. In contrast, my colleagues from India were promptly placed on new projects and allowed to continue their employment. I was ultimately terminated without being given a fair opportunity for redeployment. In addition to these issues, Wipro's employment verification process is unnecessarily burdensome. They refuse to issue verification letters directly and require future employers to contact a generic verification email address. This process is inefficient, delays onboarding, and puts candidates at a disadvantage, especially when time is of the essence. In my view, these practices reflect a broader systemic issue within the company where U.S. citizens may be deprioritized. I strongly believe that Wipro’s hiring and employee management policies should be reviewed for compliance with U.S. employment and anti-discrimination laws. Based on my experience, I would advise U.S. citizens to exercise caution when considering employment with Wipro until these concerns are transparently addressed and corrected. • I think the U.S. citizens reported being treated unfairly compared to H-1B visa holders and employees of Indian origin. • I have observed bias in project assignments, internal opportunities, and overall employee treatment favoring Indian-origin employees. • Wipro does not issue verification letters directly; instead, future employers must use a generic email address. • This process is inefficient, slows down onboarding, and disadvantages candidates when time is critical.

Continued background check from India (from an unknown background check company) 2 months into employment which was asking for 25 years of information, Very loud office and toxic environment including racist and ageist comments Management is very partial to people who have been there >20 years, and disregards the needs and input from new employees with a condescending and aggressive tone.