employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

LanguageLine Solutions

Engaged Employer

LanguageLine Solutions reviews

2.9

39% would recommend to a friend

(2,166 total reviews)

Simon Yoxon-Grant

37% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

LanguageLine Solutions has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 2,166 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The LanguageLine Solutions employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Telecomunicaciones industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Aug 18, 2016

Interpreter

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

No driving so I save on gas. Full time work includes benefits. Able to be home when my kids are home

Cons

No salary increase after 7 years. More duties have been added without a raise. Poor communication with management. Interpreters use to get bonuses, but now that has been taken away. Recently they've merged with other companies, so that means they are making more money. Interperters are expected to do more work with same pay.

1.0
Nov 3, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is absolutely nothing good about this greedy company whatsoever.

Cons

Beware:You need to monitor the call length on the Call History Board. The CHB does not display the end time of calls you interpret. LLS does not expose end time of calls to interpreters and refuses to show actual proof of call length to interpreters. You will be writing tickets in pursuit of call length corrections and correct payment for your services. Many of your tickets will be rejected. You will be routinely short-changed. If you demand payment for vanished minutes/calls, you will be punished with a reduced call volume. If you continue to submit tickets and insist on payment, you will be terminated. In addition, you will be subjected to abuse calls of all kinds. Those calls do not originate from real clients usually. They are internal calls, to intimidate interpreters, under the disguise of quality control. Some other abuse calls are meant to purely abuse for unknown reasons, or to discourage ticket submissions. I do not recommend working for this company. "LLS alleges that it has computer glitches that shorten/eliminate calls which have been interpreted. If interpreters don't compare their call length records to the call length records on LLS' Intranet Call Board, which displays interpreted calls, interpreters will not know that they are routinely loosing payments due to alleged computer glitches, which never add minutes/calls, but always shorten/eliminate. The glitches err only in one direction. Also, the Call History Board never displays the end time of a call. LLS' response to the lack of end time of calls on the Call History Board: LLS calculates the call length for interpreters, thus interpreters don't need to calculate call length; therefore exposing the end time of calls on the Call History Board is not necessary. When LLS is asked to deliver proof of call length to the interpreter, LLS refuses to show any documents that may prove actual call length. Contesting call length is limited to writing tickets on the Call History Board ticket system. Interpreters submit tickets in pursuit of call length correction and correct payment. Rejecting tickets has become LLS' preferred response increasingly, thus many interpreted minutes/calls remain unpaid. Given the fact that LLS has over 5,000 interpreters, the losses for interpreters amount to severe volumes, whereas LLS states that LLS had computer glitches for decades and LLS makes no promise as per when or if the alleged computer glitches would be ever fixed. Some past/present LLS employees/contractors stated that they never figured out how LLS calculated the minutes they interpreted. Mystery was one of the comments in this regard. They also stated they never were able to obtain explanations regarding such mysteries. My explanation is that the difference in interpreted minutes and paid minutes generates a profit somewhere. If you interpret for 16 minutes and get paid only for a few seconds, the difference translates into a profit obviously. LLS alleges clients pay for minutes interpreted, but LLS refuses to show such bills. When over 5,000 interpreters are affected by these ongoing losses, the amount of glitch-based profit would be possibly in the Millions. No payments, or at best late payments to interpreters for vanished minutes/calls, whereas this has been going on for years, produce some exorbitant profit. Post your experience here please, so we can compare. Another issue needing exposure here is that LLS has allegedly some abuse callers who call from the UK, Canada, and the USA to abuse female interpreters on the phone by pretending to be a police officer. Interpreters have been informed only about 1 alleged abuse caller from the UK however, not several callers calling from several countries. These abuse callers may happen to know a few private things about the interpreter they target and express profanities and threats to the interpreter in his/her language, though with a foreign accent. These abuse callers also happen to know confidential information of police stations' ID numbers with LLS. When LLS is asked how these alleged abuse callers know such confidential information that is available only to staff members of LLS, LLS states that these callers must be either past or present police station employees. This would mean that there is a group of alleged male ex or current employees of police stations in the UK, Canada, and the USA, who know confidential ID number information with LLS and police stations and call LLS to abuse female interpreters. To me, this does not make any sense, and LLS' explanations do not add up. Is it possible that LLS itself stages these calls, to abuse selected female interpreters Until proven otherwise, I think this is a very valid possibility. What would be the purpose of abusing selected interpreters Intimidated interpreters would not dare to write tickets perhaps Or is there an obscene person at LLS who enjoys these kinds of activities Post your experience please, so we can share information. Others stated that they work in LLS' sweatshops for minimal pay, such as less than $ 4,00 per hour. LLS outsourced its Spanish language coverage to Panama, Dominican Republic, and Puerto Rico precisely for extreme profit reasons. This translates into exploitation of foreign labor force, no doubt. The solution to this problem might be unionizing and collective actions to improve work conditions and wages. Social networking is an excellent tool that can be utilized for such goals. Unfair labor practices, fraud, and abuse can be stopped when appropriate actions are planned and practiced. Thank you very much for reading."

1.0
Aug 20, 2015

Telephonic Interpreter

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Several different tests, online testing and over the phone testing. Yes, when they try to screen for your qualification, they do work hard for it to make sure you are eligible to work for this job.

Cons

Pay was supposed to be $0.4 per minutes, but Language Line has it own way of calculation; such as if the call did not last for an hour, you won't get $0.4 per minute. They pay you the minimum wage of each state. VA is $7.25 so if I did not get enough minutes within an hour, I will get only $7.25. If I have receive call over $7.25, but under one hour, there will be another way of caculation to pay me. After 2 months of work, I realized I only get $10 per hour as a professional, skillful and well-trained interpreter. I can not believe it. I resigned fromt his company and found another company who is willing to pay me $0.70 per minute. This is not a company to work for. When they need you, they want you to meet their requirement. But when you need their help, no one is there for you. When I asked for leave, it was so hard that several different department kick me back and forth like a ball. And keep talking about a internet machine Impact 360. But that machine or software is designed to say "no" to you when you need to have a day off. Interpreter help desk is a joke. The person who is there to answer the call several of them have very strong accent. Every time when I call, i have to wait for 30-40 minutes to have a live person answer me. They are so strick that no leave is allow unless something big happen, but you need to offer proof. Overwhelmed you with work (I worked as a Mandarin interpreter 6 hours a day and the calls were nonestop), but the pay was lousy.

Viewing 181 - 183 of 2,166 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,049 LanguageLine Solutions reviews submitted anonymously by LanguageLine Solutions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if LanguageLine Solutions is right for you.